I’m doing some teaching/training tomorrow on “The Elder and Pastoral Care”. In preparation, browsing through the Pastoral Care section of my library, I came across The Cost of Certainty: How Religious Conviction Betrays the Human Psyche (2004) by Jeremy Young. Here is an extract from the first chapter, “The Gospels of Conditional and Unconditional Love”. I wonder if it resonates …
“My own induction into the Gospel of Conditional Love happened at the age of sixteen during a school trip to see the Oberammergau Passion Play. The play made the Christian faith seem real to me for the first time, and so ‘I gave my life to Jesus as my Lord and Saviour’ at 8:25 a.m. on 23 August 1970. Immediately I experienced an overwhelming sense of the presence of Christ and was convinced that I had found the meaning of life. When I returned home … I joined a local conservaive Evangelical church … I also became intolerant and puritan.
“The teaching which I received at my church, and at the Christian house parties I attended, stressed God’s love for us. However, we were also told that God is holy and just and that, apart from Jesus, he could have nothing to do with us, because of our sinfulness….
“Looking back now, it seems clear to me that the emotional message I actually received was definitely not that God loved me unconditionally. Rather it was that his love for me could easily turn to rejection. In some part of myself I believed that God would only continue to love me if I continued to be good enough and to believe the right things about him. Such an emotional conviction about God is not going to encourage deep trust or confidence. Instead, those who feel like this will be very careful not to upset this God, and will definitely not believe that they are accepted as the people they happen to be. As a consequence, they will try very hard to become what they are supposed to be, and may pretend to be better than they are. That, at least, was my experience and, I know, that of many of my fellow young Christians.
“…. The most important implication of Jesus’ behaviour [however] is that God loves us unconditionally and accepts us prior to any response that we may make to his love. Jesus’ initiative somehow frees people to respond. The response is not the condition of acceptance, but the means by which the discovery of already being accepted is manifested in their lives.
“In my opinion, the distinction between God’s acceptance following from and being conditional upon repentance or conversion, and acceptance being the basis upon which it becomes possible for repentance and conversion to occur, is absolutely vital to the development of a form of the Christian religion that is free from the polarising and exclusionary attitudes that feature so prominently in traditional Christianity. Only if God’s grace genuinely encompasses the whole of a person, good and bad, can true healing and the concomitant transformation of the individual personality become possible.”
{ 0 comments }