No heartless innkeeper, no cold and lonely stable

by Kim on December 22, 2011

Matthew informs his readers that the wise men entered the house where they saw Mary and the child (Mt 2:1-12). The story in Matthew confirms the suggestion that Luke’s account describes a birth in a private home.

With this understanding in mind, all the cultural problems I have noted are solved. Joseph was not obliged to seek a commercial inn. He does not appear as an inept and inadequate husband who cannot arrange for Mary’s needs. Likewise, Joseph did not anger his wife’s relatives by failing to turn to them in a crisis. The child was born in the normal surroundings of a peasant home sometime after they arrived in Bethlehem, and there was no heartless innkeeper with whom to deal. A member of the House of David was not humiliated by rejection as he returned to the village of his family’s origins. The people of Bethlehem offered the best they had and preserved their honor as a community. The shepherds were not hardhearted oafs without the presence of mind to help a needy family of strangers.

Our Christmas crèche sets remain as they are because “ox and ass before him bow, / for he is in the manger now.” But that manger was in a warm and friendly home, not in a cold and lonely stable. Looking at the story in this light strips away layers of interpretive mythology that have built up around it. Jesus was born in a simple two-room village home such as the Middle East has known for at least three thousand years. Yes, we must rewrite our Christmas plays, but in rewriting them, the story is enriched, not cheapened.

Kenneth E. Bailey, Jesus through Middle Eastern Eyes: Cultural Studies in the Gospels (London: SPCK, 2008), p. 36.

{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }


Richard 12.23.11 at 9:41 am

Thanks for posting that Kim.


Paul Martin 12.23.11 at 10:12 am

Bailey’s book is a great read. The section on the birth of Jesus seemed convincing to me. A reminder that our traditional nativities are beautifully creative but should be seen as such rather than how it happened accounts


Kim 12.23.11 at 11:35 am

Yes, and it’s about time we heard a good word about Joseph. I reckon he should be in the creeds. Perhaps:

“… born of [The Apostles' Creed] / was incarnate of the Holy Spirit and [The Nicene Creed] the Virgin Mary, Joe’s partner.”

“Partner” would be politically correct. “Wife” might be acceptable. But I suspect we’d have problems getting “missus”, let alone “trouble and strife” or “ball and chain” past feminists and Catholics.

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>