Ascension Day

by Richard on May 17, 2012

He led them out as far as Bethany, and lifting up his hands, he blessed them. While he was blessing them, he withdrew from them and was carried up into heaven. And they worshipped him, and returned to Jerusalem with great joy; and they were continually in the temple blessing God.
Luke 24: 50-53

While Methodists do not, as a rule, make very much of Ascension Day it is an important marker in the story of our salvation. Leave aside the literalist questions about “what happened” and the ultimately pointless question of why Luke gives us two different accounts of the same event. Consider instead the significance of this story: what does it mean for followers of Jesus?

First, it signifies that the movement God makes to us is not merely one way. In the incarnation, we declare that God takes our flesh and comes among us. “Our God contracted to a span, Incomprehensibly made man” was how Wesley put it in his incomparably poetry. Good news! God is with us. But be honest. Who has faith enough to respond to that kind of overwhelming self-giving? For me, it is the Ascension of Christ that ‘completes the circle’. Just as in the Incarnation God comes to us, so in the Ascension we are taken back to God. Jesus Christ, the new Adam, the representative of us all, takes our flesh into the presence of God that we may follow him. It is above all a declaration of God’s grace. All our weakest, most feeble and hesitant steps of faith can be caught up in his perfect faithfulness. There is no part of our salvation which relies on us. It has all been done by the unchanging grace of God. And by the Holy Spirit, that “double movement” from God to humanity, humanity to God continues in the lives of his people and the life of his church.

Second, the Ascension declares the Lordship of Jesus. Not over selected people, lands, places or parts of our lives. All of it. That “Jesus is Lord” is a done deal. There is no more to be said except, “Will you recognize his claim?” His rule extends to our politics and economic policies, for there is no part of our lives from which his lordship is absent. Here we have to admit that even the most outwardly ardent followers of Jesus have fallen short. Political debate among Christians has little to distinguish it: we have too often given way to ‘realism’ and expediency, conveniently ignoring this most consistent claim of the gospel. He can be a personal Lord and Saviour, but it will be the markets that have the final say when it comes to money. He can have loyalty in the worldwide struggle against powers and systems, but musn’t interfere with my autonomy. Right or Left, we have too often subjugated Christ to whatever political instincts and ideologies make their rival claims upon us.

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }


Pam 05.17.12 at 10:12 am

I wonder why treasuring our autonomy somehow equates with not being ’subject’ to Christ. I think it’s a good thing to have diverse views within a congregation, and church. We all ‘read’ the Bible in relation to our circumstances in life - how could it be any other way. Or maybe the Bible encourages us to ‘read’ ourselves a little better. I like having questions and not knowing all the answers.


Richard 05.17.12 at 10:32 am

I didn’t put that very well, did I? I was trying to say that just as “the Right” is tempted to make the claims of Christ entirely personal and nothing to do with the economic, social and political, so “the Left” is tempted to make the gospel about the social and political to the exclusion of the personal. I agree with all that you say here.


Pam 05.17.12 at 11:30 am

I like being agreed with! Possibly I was a little hasty in asserting your geekiness. :)


John 05.17.12 at 2:44 pm

Cool kitty Richard. Double movement. His image upon us; our image upon him. Regarding money and the markets, expressed by Tertullian when he proposed that we render the image of Caesar, which is on the coin, to Caesar, and the image of God, which is on man [sic] to God, so as to render to Caesar indeed money, to God ourselves. Sovereign in deed.

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>