“The Bartimaeus Incident” — a sermon

by Kim on October 28, 2012

This is the second time in Mark that Jesus heals a blind man. Both healings come at pivotal points in the narrative. The first occurs at the midpoint of the gospel, just before the critical incident at Caesarea Philippi, where Jesus asks the disciples, “Who do you say that I am?”, and then reveals his messianic identity. So the first healing acts as a bridge between the two halves of the gospel. Mark is not a careless writer. He does everything for a reason. “Pay attention!” he is saying.

The first healing happened in Bethsaida. It’s a town on the north shore of the Sea of Galilee. In John’s gospel we learn that Peter, Philip, and Andrew lived there. In Mark’s gospel, it’s the town to which the disciples set sail while Jesus went into the hills to pray. You may remember that a strong wind suddenly blew up and surprised them, that they strained at the oars, and that when Jesus appeared walking on water, they freaked out, and were rebuked for their fear and faithlessness. They never got to Bethsaida.

Eventually, however, they did get there, to witness that first healing of a blind man. But there was a hitch: Jesus’ first touch was only partially successful – the man mistook trees for people – so Jesus had to lay his hands on the man’s eyes a second time before his vision was fully restored. And then what happened next at Caesarea Philippi? How interesting: Peter answered Jesus’ question correctly – “You are the Messiah” – but he did not “see” correctly the meaning of Messiah, did not “see” the kind of Messiah that Jesus is, not an all-conquering hero but a nonviolent and vulnerable servant. Still, at least some progress had been made since the fiasco on the lake: the vision of the disciples was fuzzy, but they were not altogether blind, not after Jesus instructed them about his coming suffering and death.

Which brings us to today’s text, the Bartimaeus incident, the second healing of a blind man – and the last healing miracle in the gospel. Not at Bethsaida – via Caesarea Philippi Jesus has moved on toward Jerusalem, and now he is at Jericho, a suburb fifteens miles from the capital. But it also happens at a pivotal point in the narrative: it is the last event before the Triumphal Entry on Palm Sunday. Again, Mark is saying, “Pay attention!” Indeed, pay particular attention: the blind man has a name, and Mark rarely names people in his gospel. And the name Bartimaeus – in Hebrew it means “son of the unclean”.

Remember the story of the haemorrhaging woman (Mark 7:24ff.)? She too was “unclean”. Clean-unclean, pure-impure, righteous-sinner, us-them – the distinctions mean nothing to Jesus. He healed that woman. And he told her that her faith had made her well. Jesus also heals Bartimaeus. And guess what? – he tells him too that his faith has made him well. Do you think that’s coincidental? And the “crowd” – in both stories there are crowds. And in both stories they are a hindrance, indeed a threat. The woman had to force her way through the crowd; the crowd berates Bartimaeus, tells him to shut up. Crowds. Public opinion. Soon they’ll be waving palm branches and cheering Jesus into Jerusalem – and soon after that they’ll be baying for his blood. Crowds and public opinion. Fickle. Never trust them.

There is yet another story with a connection to the Bartimaeus incident. Remember the rich guy (Mark 10:17ff.)? We heard about him a fortnight ago. He encountered Jesus (the text says) “on the way” (10:17). Mark uses the exact same words here – but while the rich guy turned away, Bartimaeus follows Jesus “on the way” (10:52). And Bartimaeus is a poor man. The rich man could not part with his possessions, but Bartimaeus throws away his only means of making a living, his cloak – beggars spread out their cloaks, like buskers put out their hats, to receive a coin or a crust from passers-by. And “the way” – we’re not just talking the Jericho Road here: “the way” was the first name Christians used to describe their faith: they were people of “the way”, the way of Jesus, the “way of the cross”. And scholars suggest that the reason that the name Bartimaeus was known to Mark is that he became a prominent member in the early church. Rich man-poor man: the first went to last, the last jumped the queue. So many connections. Coincidental? Yes, Mark is a clever writer. Mark was a genius.

There’s still more. Back to the disciples. Immediately before the Bartimaeus incident, John and James had approached Jesus, and Jesus said, “What can I do for you?” When Bartimaeus approaches Jesus, Jesus replies with exactly the same words. But how different the requests! John and James, you may remember, asked for the big seats next to Jesus in the kingdom of God. But Bartimaeus – Bartimaeus simply wants to see. From the request of John and James, it is quite clear that they didn’t see at all. The promise of Caesarea Philippi, when the disciples had at least begun to see, albeit fuzzily, like the blind man at Bethsaida – it had come to nought. The disciples had reverted to thinking of the Messiah in terms of power and privilege, not weakness and service. Of course Jesus did not, could not, grant the request of the brothers known as the “sons of thunder”. “Thunder … is impressive,” said Mark Twain, “but it is the lightening that does the work.” Bartimaeus, you might say, “son of filth”, is a “son of lightening” – the light shines, he sees. He sees even before he sees, sees who Jesus is even before he sees Jesus in the flesh – he cries out, “Son of David!”, a messianic title, just as Peter had cried out, “You are the Christ!” But though Peter could see Jesus in the flesh, he didn’t see who Jesus is. And unlike all the other healing miracles in Mark, Bartimaeus doesn’t go home, dosn’t return to his livelihood, no, he abandons it all and follows, “on the way”, the way of Jesus, the “way of the cross”. And Golgotha is now only a week or so away.

Mark – what a great storyteller – simple, plain-speaking, but as skilful as they come, weaving together people, themes, and even phrases to make a pattern – and to make a point. And what is the point? In two words, following Jesus – what it means, what it entails. It means transformation, beginning with a radical perceptual shift. Everything Jesus says and does, his actions and his teaching – they are all an invitation to a different way of seeing – seeing Jesus – and in the light of Jesus seeing the world and your life – what are you going to make of it, what are you going to do with it? Jesus is not interested in inculcating a set of beliefs, or inducing warm feelings or emotional highs. It’s all about vision. It’s about waking up and seeing the world as broken, yes, full of stupidity and greed and violence and pain, but a world that God loves and cares for and graces with possibilities of intelligence, generosity, peace, and healing. And then it’s about action – acting on what you see, by following Jesus and doing what he does, as part of a community of friends, mutually supportive and encouraging, dedicated to disciplines that shape our characters so that we may be a people of truth, mercy, and reconciliation, people who are free, joyful, and bold in the face of what is oppressive, depressing, and scary, regardless of popular opinion or what the world calls sensible, useful, or relevant.

So the Bartimaeus incident leaves us with several pressing questions. Are we willing to buck the crowd and critique the conventional? Are we willing to reach out to folk who don’t fit and welcome them into community? Are we willing to recognise that outsiders may actually have more insight about Jesus than insiders do? Are we willing to throw off our cloaks, the things that protect us and behind which we hide, and fearlessly and faithfully follow the Lord wherever he leads us? In short, are we willing to be disciples, which in the Greek means “learners”? And are we willing to go on learning, and go on learning, to be Christian in ever new ways?

Over 25 years ago I bought a book. I revisit it so often that the pages are falling out. It’s called What Prevents Christian Adults from Learning. There is, the author suggests, a constellation of obstructions to learning: the need to be right, the fear of being wrong, the security of the known, the pain of un-learning, the hard work of re-thinking, the disturbance of dissonance, the ubiquity of distraction. Quite a challenging agenda. As a teacher, the author has been working at it his entire career. As a minister I’ve tried too. The author’s name is John Hull. The book is full of insight. The thing is: John Hull is blind. But he sees. Do we?

{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }

1

Graham 10.28.12 at 10:23 am

That is really helpful- thank you.

From the sublime to the ridiculous; I am leading a holiday club this week and that is one of the passages- this helps, as do the insights for my passage today of Mark 9:30-37. I guess in what we are doing we are attempting to engage with the outsiders; that feels like lonely work.

From this blog site and from (I guess) a different tradition, I feel enouraged and lifted up. Thank you for preaching to me.

2

Avraham Reiss 10.28.12 at 2:52 pm

[quote] And the name Bartimaeus – in Hebrew it means “son of the unclean”. [unquote]

Not Hebrew; its Aramaic, except that the -aeus suffix is not Aramaic.
The Hebrew for ’son’ in ‘ben’, whereas in Aramaic it is ‘bar’. ‘Unclean’ in Hebrew is ‘tamai’, so apart from two mistakes in one word, Kim probably got it right.

But I never understood the claim to being ’son of David’, since the NT states explicitly that 1) the lineage back to David is through Joseph, Mary’s husband, but 2) Joseph was not the father, since Mary’s conception was by Immaculate Conception.

3

lorraine 10.28.12 at 6:19 pm

insightful and helpful…
Jesus is, not an all-conquering hero but a nonviolent and vulnerable servant.
Crowds and public opinion. Fickle. Never trust them.
It’s about waking up and seeing the world as broken,
And then it’s about action –

This makes Christ and Christian action relevent to my world,
Thank you
Read more: http://theconnexion.net/wp/?p=13008#ixzz2AcA7Upds
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution Share Alike

4

Bill 10.31.12 at 9:58 pm

Great message. I’m in the middle of a study of Mark and I agree with you–he was a clever and brilliant writer.

5

REVD. JOHN WRIGHT 09.21.15 at 6:00 pm

Avraham is mistaken - Mary’s conception of Jesus is NOT called “the Immaculate Conception”. That term refers to Mary being conceived by her parents (whose names are usually thought to be Joachim and Anna) in the normal human way, and to the Catholic belief that in a special blessing God then preserved hee from “original sin” the inherited sin of Adam. “Immaculate” means “free from sin”, not “free from sex” as in the conception of Jesus- we do not believe that sex is ALWAYS sinful.

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>