The Disappearance of the Church as the Demonstration of Its Truth

by Kim on June 23, 2006

If Christianity leaps high in Africa and walks tall (well, medium-height) in America, in Britain it staggers and falls to its knees. That’s the bad news. But worse news still is the way many Christians respond.

Some circle the wagons and gather round the campfires of nostalgia. They tell tales of revival, packed pews and thriving Sunday Schools; they put on summer Sankey sing-songs and play it again and again, Sam; they organise fetes and fayres, coffee mornings and coach-trips, for dwindling numbers of loyalists; and, rather than covenant with the church across the road, they pray that they may be left to die in peace before the dry rot closes them down (”health and safety” issues - how ironic!) and call it faithfulness. The body of Christ has become a corpse. This is the way of despair.

Then there is the way of assimilation. Instead of ignoring our postmodern context, assimilators capitulate to it, while smugly assuming that they are spoiling rather than apeing the Egyptians. Their creed is: Organisational Performance is God, the Management Guru is his prophet, and the Alpha Course is the bread - or rather the pasta - of life. In place of the pulpit and the sermon we get PowerPoint and bullet points, as casually dressed “worship leaders” with lapel mikes stroll around the sanctuary “telling their story” and getting folk to “share”. The church has become a small marketing firm, its ministers motivators, its lay-leaders cheerleaders, its members punters and consumers. It promotes programmes like “Catching the Vision” or “Re-imagining the Future”, but the bottom line is, well, the bottom line of financial prudence.

If despair or assimilation are the best we can do, then I would suggest that God’s experiment in this particular laboratory of the Sprit we call the church may be over. Perhaps we need to consider the possibility that we are in such a parlous state not because of the indifference or hostility of the world, but because God, in his judgement, has sent us into exile; and that what is called for is neither hankering after the fleshpots of old-time religion, nor singing choruses while dancing round the golden calf of technology, but the sackcloth and ashes of repentance.

Kierkegaard prophetically, if paradoxically, declared that the day may come when God takes Christianity away from Europe as the final proof of its truth.

{ 7 comments… read them below or add one }

1

Eugene McKinnon 06.23.06 at 6:44 pm

And I say to this Amen!

I am sickened by the extremes as well. The little country rural church to the mega church wannabe that is my home church. Kim you know my area well.

Eugene

2

Richard 06.23.06 at 7:23 pm

Thanks for that, Kim.
I needed cheering up…

3

gaunilo 06.23.06 at 7:27 pm

[to continue a conversation from elsewhere!]

Kim, very well put. If these are the alternatives open to the church, then it indeed deserves a swift end to its misery. But I wonder: are these the only possibilities left? Might it be possible that a fractured and scarred body might continue to be a site of the Spirit’s dwelling - in the courage to take up the question of being the church as church anew?

Troeltsch had a moment of insight when he saw that the essence of Christianity is precisely the question of the determination of that essence, that the essence just is task and challenge. (Kierkegaard: if the moment is to be of any significance…)

If God indeed did judge this ‘laboratory of the Spirit’ - and indeed who are we to determine God’s judgment? - then what might we understand the body of Christ (the totus christus) to become?

Thanks for this conversation. I find this question intriguing.

4

Kim 06.23.06 at 10:03 pm

Thanks, Gaunilo.

Your last question - the million-dinar question - guarantees that the conversation will continue. Ezekiel’s psychedelic prophecy pictures a valley of skeletons turning into a rave-house. Imagining the future of the church on the other side of exile will require an equally radical conjuring.

Mind you - also to continue a conversation from elsewhere! - I’m with von Balthasar in hoping that the “total Christ is none other than total humanity”. But that’s eschatology, not ecclesiology.

5

Kim 06.24.06 at 8:48 am

Hey, Richard: I needed cheering up . . .”.

I refer you to my previous post “Stuff Happens”. :)

6

Bene D 06.24.06 at 1:53 pm

You might enjoy The Heresy’s look at what is required of the church as individuals and a body and while he doesn’t discount traditional models can fulfil these things, he has a real challenge for us and took the time to go through the NT and list them.

7

gaunilo 06.24.06 at 5:47 pm

Ah, but maybe one of our problems is not thinking eschatology with our ecclesiology (not to mention pneumatology!)? :-)

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>