The Madeleine McCann Show

by Kim on September 22, 2007

I wonder what all you guys think about The Madeleine McCann Show. Because that is what it has turned into, a show, or better, a soap, a reality-soap, whose storyline the writers of Eastenders must envy and the rest of us follow with a combination of compassionate concern and perverse fascination as we anxiously await the next episode.

There are several factors to the obsession. One, of course, its sine qua non, is the media attention. As the doyen of American TV-journalists Walter Cronkite once said, “The news is what I say it is.” Not only the British, indeed the global media said, “Let the McCann story be the news - and, behold, the McCann story was news.”

Another factor is the archetypal, mythological nature of the story: beautiful blond child in alien environment seized by the dark force - it perfectly fits the genre of the fairy tale and taps into the subterranean fears of the collective unconscious. That the family is educated, wealthy - and Christian - adds to the frisson.

In Britain there is also the Diana factor of mass emotional inflation and the icon of the teddy bear.

And fundamentally, of course, there is the mystery: what actually happened? The overwhelming initial presumption was that Madeleine was abducted either by a predatory paedophile, the paragon of contemporary demonic figures, or by a more calculating, capitalist kidnapper for whom the child was a commodity to be sold to a speculator in the marketplace of children. Then, in the late summer, the unthinkable: suspicions turned on Madeleine’s parents, and specifically, on her mother Kate - the heinous violation of love and trust - suspicions fuelled by leaks and half-truths about the police investigations, compounded by anticipations of a CSI solution to the case, scientifically done-and-dusted.

In the UK there are also subtexts. One is racial (and deplorable): What do a bunch of spic detectives know about complex criminal procedures and forensic examinations? Another is classist (and there is some truth to it): If Madeleine’s mother were a single chav parent, do you think for a moment that she wouldn’t be on the receving end of calumny rather than sympathy for leaving her children on their own for half an hour?

So much for the cod analysis. But two more very serious, if obvious, points. First, this is not a show, there is a little girl out there who is missing. Keep Madeleine in your prayers. And let her be a synecdoche for all missing children: keep all missing children in your prayers. And keep Madeleine’s family, and the investigators too, in your prayers.

Second - and I’ll put this in my usual unprovocative way - if you have an opinion about what has actually happened to Madeleine you are an idiot. If you are aghast and outraged that Gerry and Kate McCann could even come under suspicion, or, conversely, if you have turned on them with accusatory malice, then you are a mere weathervane in the arbitrary and shifting winds of slipshod jounalism. We simply do not have the information we need to evaluate in order reach a rational and judicious conclusion on the matter. So along with prayer, a little more of what Keats called “negative capability”, please: the capacity “of being in uncertainties, mysteries, doubts without any irritable reaching after fact and reason.”

{ 12 comments… read them below or add one }

1

chrise 09.22.07 at 10:52 am

think you are way off the mark re havining opions. part of being a human is to have opinions. OK, our opinions may be wrong and/or misguided but having opinions is part of the human condition. it would be a bland world indeed if people were devoid of these until “the truth” was out.

2

Paul Martin 09.22.07 at 10:55 am

Well posted Kim.

The first important matter is that a girl is missing. The second important factor is that we are not in a position to in any way judge speculation concerning the parents who must remain innocent unless proven otherwise.

The leaking by both the Portuguese police (ours do it as well) and the media hardly makes it the finest hour f police or media.

As for the debate that is particularly prevalent in comments on the websites of Daily Mail and Daily Express, these represent the worst sort of lynch mob mentality. It is a shame that the morons who jump to conclusions as if they have all the facts, have to inflict their ignorance upon the public. It needs to be remembered that people can be broken by the media and left to pick up the pieces when a new stry emerges. Think of the invasive coverage of Robert Murat as an example , the Express even comparing him on its front page to Ian Huntley at the time when he was first a suspect

Indeed there is almost something pornogaphic at the prurient coverage that comes especially from the Express. Frankly this sad story is fro them a mean of making money. It has been constantly the front page story for at least a couple of months. We are reminded that we are at times a very shallow people

3

Kim 09.22.07 at 12:08 pm

Hi Chrise,

I’ve obviously got nothing against opinions as such, but purely speculative and uninformed opinions are a menace, a subset of sheer prejudice. One should not have an opinion on a matter about which one doesn’t have the facts to base it on.

Paul Vallely begins an article on the McCann fiasco in this week’s Church Times by saying: “I do not have a view on what happened to Madeleine McCann. And I don’t want one.” That, I submit, is the responsible position to take.

4

Richard 09.22.07 at 12:21 pm

You’re quite right - as this story has played out, there does seem to have been a disturbing assumption in the British press that johnny foreigner’s police weren’t up to such an important investigation. You’re also right that none of us can really have an informed opinion about this dreadful story. We can’t help having opinions though! But I agree to this extent: most of that opinion is better left unexpressed.

Oh, and thanks for the new word. I’m going to try to get ’synecdoche’ into conversation this week!

5

Tom Allen 09.22.07 at 1:10 pm

I think you have missed a key element of this event - the unmentionable bit of it - which is how two professional doctors could be so stupid or think it appropriate to leave three small children in a room and go for a meal such a distance away - never mind the possibility of kidnap - to a small child in an unfamiliar room 1/2 hour would seem like an eternity - that is what I think has left people I have talked to uncertain about and which has bought home to three parents the risks they had or are taking with their own kids - which adds to the sense of angst and guilt etc etc.

But I think it is simplistic to dismiss criticism of the police as rascist - it was a portugese aquaintance ( married to an English copper) who first said to me that the police investigation was a shambles and she did not expect anything different - its a classic case of things falling between the gap in a two level police force - as the track record of the officers involved in previous cases becomes clearer in the Portugese press then there are serious questions to be asked.

6

Mark Byron 09.22.07 at 2:11 pm

So the UK has a JonBenet Ramsey case (kiddy beauty contest winner goes missing and gets killed at home with no break-in) set on holiday. In that case, the Ramseys got grilled as suspects, but nothing has yet to be proven; one of them has since died.

Our US media has a fixation on these “cute missing female” cases, and it was only time before the British press got the bug.

7

Kim 09.22.07 at 2:49 pm

To further cultivate your semantic interest, Richard, synecdoche is sometimes confued with metonomy, a word one often comes across in postmodern discourse (sometimes, I confess, to my great befuddlement). The former is a figure of speech that names a part for the whole (and sometimes vice-versa), the latter an attribute of a thing standing in for the thing itself.

I’ve found a good way of remembering the difference - with metaphor thrown in as a freebie - is the following sentence (taken from Richard Appignansei and Christ Garratt, Postmodernism for Beginners [1995]: “Fifty keels ploughed the deep” - where “ploughed” is the metaphor, “keels” the synecdoche, and “the deeps” the metonym.

And thanks for your comment, Tom. Your point was partly behind my suggestion about the stick a single chav mum would have taken after the event. When I was at Oxford, one evening when my wife was out and our four-year-old child was tucked in bed and soundly sleeping, I quickly peddled down the street from our digs to get a kebab. It must have taken ten minutes. When, on her return, I told Angie what I had done, she almost killed me. It would have been justifiable homicide.

8

PamBG 09.22.07 at 4:55 pm

We don’t have the information and it is a ’show’. The only reaction I have is that the whole thing makes my stomach turn.

9

chrise 09.22.07 at 6:17 pm

But surely Kim, if you carry that argument to its conclusion then we shouldn’t hold opinions on any subject where facts and proof have not been ascertained. There are a whole load of topics here where we would be denied an opinion - afterall, can the truth be really known on any subject. At the end of the day what most of our ‘knowledge’ boils down to is our best guesses and opinions.

10

trannyfattyacid 09.22.07 at 8:01 pm

I disagree with you slightly about the Diana thing. I would argue the similarity is that we are living through a similar spin campaign that seeks to silence the critics. And it the same people who hysterically adored Diana, who shout about the impossiblity of catholic doctors to have killed their child.

11

Eugene McKinnon 09.23.07 at 4:30 am

Hi All,

We have here in Canada a child by the name of Cedrika Provencher who is missing in Quebec. The neighbours in her Trois Riveires’ suburb said they saw her asking around about a missing black dog. She doesn’t own a dog.

We don’t have the hype here about her as you do about Madeleine McCann, but missing children is a sad thing and it’s best that we continue praying that the two are safe and that they will be returned home.

Kim you are right. This is a horrible reality series and I hope that they find that girl. And I agree about the whole mourning Princess Diana all over again, we need to move on, enough is enough.

Eugene McKinnon

12

Richard Brennan 12.17.07 at 2:12 pm

I think you have made some very good points here.

I also wonder how moany of those that make YouTube videos about the McCanns do so simply to make themselves feel part of the investigation.

Their time would be better spent funding missing childrens’ charities.

I am confident the Uk police out there and PJ are doing the best they can

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>