‘Benefit fraud’ fraud

by Richard on October 21, 2010

Zoe Williams: This talk of ‘benefit cheats’ is not only stigmatising, it is slanderous, too

So imagine you did two hours a week cash-in-hand work over the 16 hours you’re allowed: and over three months, your fraud amounted to £1,000, since you shouldn’t have been on jobseeker’s allowance at all. That’s what politicians should be asking us to envisage when they set upon this bugbear with their big sticks: people on very low incomes earning a very small amount extra and not declaring it. I am amazed that the figure for fraud is so low. When you consider the incompetence of the DWP and HMRC, you would be mad to declare a small cash-in-hand income to them. You’d probably find yourself not just having your benefits withdrawn, but also on an emergency code, erroneously charged tax that it would take you years to recover.

There is a very important failure of governance here: people are being cheated out of benefits by an incompetent system, they are being threatened for their own mistakes and simultaneously screwed by the DWP, and 200 extra employees are being taken on as “anti-fraud” officers when the first priority of government should be that it has enough staff to get its sums right.

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

1

Kim 10.21.10 at 12:53 pm

White collar fraud, on the other hand, is well rewarded, even lauded.

2

Kim 10.21.10 at 12:55 pm

Now I’ve got to get away from this blog, and out. Jeez, Richard, you’re like the proverbial British bus - nothing for yonks and then they come along in numbers! ;)

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>