Hymn of the day

by Richard on April 7, 2013

O for a thousand tongues to sing
My dear Redeemer’s praise,
The glories of my God and King,
The triumphs of his grace!

My gracious Master and my God,
Assist me to proclaim,
To spread through all the earth abroad
The honours of Thy name.

Jesus! The name that charms our fears,
That bids our sorrows cease;
‘Tis music in the sinner’s ears,
‘Tis life, and health, and peace.

He breaks the power of cancelled sin,
He sets the prisoner free;
His blood can make the foulest clean,
His blood availed for me.

He speaks, and, listening to his voice,
New life the dead receive,
The mournful, broken hearts rejoice,
The humble poor believe.

Hear Him, ye deaf, His praise, ye dumb,
Your loosened tongues employ;
Ye blind, behold your Saviour come,
And leap, ye lame, for joy.

Look unto Him, ye nations, own
Your God, ye fallen race;
Look, and be saved through faith alone,
Be justified by grace.

See all your sins on Jesus laid:
The Lamb of God was slain,
His soul was once an offering made
For every soul of man.

In Christ your Head, ye then shall know,
Shall feel your sins forgiven;
Anticipate your heaven below,
And own that love is heaven.

Charles Wesley

{ 0 comments }

How Casino Royale should have ended

by Richard on April 6, 2013

{ 0 comments }

Sometimes you have to walk away

by Richard on April 5, 2013

Velveteen Rabbi keeps coming up with good stuff. I’m hardly an authority on the art of the poetic, but her piece today made my spirits stir and I hope I’ll be forgiven for quoting the whole thing.

WORD TO THE WISE

here: click on the X
to close the browser window,
clap the clamshell laptop shut

resist the twitching impulse
to open up Facebook
in search of one more pellet

remember that in public spaces
the comments are a hive
of stinging wasps

take three deep breaths
all the way to your diaphragm
lower your clenched shoulders

steep your mind’s tofu
in a gentle bath of poetry
seasoned with psalms

savor all five tastes
with no danger of sickness
in the hard drive or the heart

{ 0 comments }

Allan R. Bevere

If the temptation of the state is to domesticate the church into doing its bidding, it is the continual temptation of the individual to domesticate Jesus so that he simply affirms our lives as they our instead of calling us to what God wants them to be.

Jesus doesn’t call us to embrace a vague idea of spirituality where the most important task is to contemplate our own individual and spiritual navels; rather Jesus calls us to follow him– and it makes a big difference what Jesus we choose to follow. Jesus himself insisted that people count the cost before they follow (Luke 14:25-33). There is not much cost in vague spirituality. In fact, it’s pretty darn easy. That’s what makes it so attractive.

Jesus did not come to conform to our expectations; Jesus came and insisted that we fit into his will for our lives. Resurrection is not about affirming life as it is; it is about transforming life into what God insists it must become.

{ 2 comments }

Day by day

by Richard on April 3, 2013

@RevRichardColes reminds us that today is the feast day of Richard of Chichester. That’s all the excuse I need.

{ 0 comments }

I’ve just finished reading Mark Thomas’ Extreme Rambling, a fascinating and funny account of the comedian’s attempt to walk the route of Israel’s security barrier. It isn’t a book that is likely to appeal to any of Israel’s apologists, though his route took in both sides of the fence and the effects of terrorism are acknowledged from the first. By its nature, this is an anecdotal account rather than a rigorous political analysis but in the end the stories of individuals and families matter more than grand political narratives.

I’ve not been in the habit of posting book reviews, and I’m not intending to start now. Thomas concludes that while the usual rationale given for the barrier is security, “This barrier of wire and concrete is a blunt instrument of complex desires but, unfold them, and this wall, this fence, this military barrier, is the continuation of the conflict in concrete and wire form. It imposes a de facto border, creating a one-sided ’solution’ achieved not through negotiation but through subjugation. It claims security but grabs land, which settlers then build upon. It is no mere protective shield but a military entity which … has the added intent of destroying a possible Palestinian state.”

This is not a book that will convince a Zionist. (I doubt such a book exists) But if you want to understand something of the barrier’s effects on those who live in its shadow, this would not be a bad place to start.

{ 6 comments }

Consumerist theology

by Richard on April 2, 2013

Dr John Stackhouse on provocative form

In a distinction I first encountered in Chesterton, you certainly are free (politically and socially) to call yourself a giraffe, but if you want to communicate, you’d better have a very long neck, a spotted coat, and backward-bending knees to be taken seriously as such. You certainly are free (politically and socially) to call yourself a Christian, but if you want anyone serious to take you seriously, your beliefs and practices have to conform with what literally defines Christianity—among which sources is not your own individual opinion.

Today is the day in which we Christians say to each other, “The Lord has risen!” Among the appropriate responses is not, “Well, I prefer to think otherwise. This whole bodily resurrection thing seems so primitive to me, rather embarrassing, actually, and I’d much rather affirm the glory of a new springtime, the miracle of the life cycle, and the promise of hope in everyone’s heart.”

By all means, let’s provoke each other to love and good deeds (Hebrews 10:24), and among those “good deeds” can be better understandings of theology—that is, interpretations of the Bible and of everything else God has shown us that correspond better to the evidence; cohere with what else we hold as fundamentally true, good and beautiful; and issue in holy love. What isn’t on the table is milk and cookies if you just like them better than bread and wine.

{ 0 comments }

Aspiration Nation

by Richard on April 1, 2013

Marcus Brigstocke was on brilliant form on last Friday’s ‘The Now Show’.

{ 3 comments }

The Holy Box

by Richard on March 31, 2013

The Bible had been rolled away,
The Holy Name of Jesus lay
Like crumpled linen on the floor.
A stranger stood beside the door.
“You will not find him here,” he said
“This is the dwelling of the dead.
You put him in a holy box
But he has shattered all the locks.
By Christ or any other name
The shape of truth would be the same.”

I woke, and it was eight o’clock.
I heard the crowing of a cock,
I heard the tolling of a bell.
The church was standing: all was well,
I knew the Bible, thick and black,
Was safe upon the eagle’s back.
How could Jesus be the same
If he had another name?

Holy, holy is the box.
Nobody can break the locks.

Sydney Carter

{ 1 comment }

Hymn of the day

by Richard on March 31, 2013

Our Lord is risen from the dead!
Our Jesus is gone up on high!
The powers of hell are captive led,
Dragged to the portals of the sky.

There his triumphal chariot waits,
And angels chant the solemn lay:
Lift up your heads, you heavenly gates;
You everlasting doors, give way!

Loose all your bars of massy light,
And wide unfold the ethereal scene;
He claims these mansions as his right
Receive the King of glory in!

Who is this King of glory? who?
The Lord that all our foes overcame;
The world, sin, death, and hell overthrew;
And Jesus is the conqueror’s name.

Lo! His triumphal chariot waits,
And angels chant the solemn lay:
Lift up your heads, you heavenly gates;
You everlasting doors give way!

Who is the King of Glory, who?
The Lord of glorious power possessed,
The King of saints and angels, too;
God over all, forever blest!

Charles Wesley

{ 0 comments }

Methodist President’s Easter Message

by Richard on March 30, 2013

Who’s to blame?

The Methodist Church, through our Joint Public Issues Team, has been bringing to our attention a great untruth perpetrated by some press and some politicians alike: we’re told that poverty is the fault of the poor.

There has always been a temptation to do this, something John Wesley was well aware of when he said it is, “foolish and wickedly false… to say [the poor] are poor because they are idle”.

A few years ago our beliefs about poverty, grounded firmly in careful study and research, understood many social ills, such as drug and alcohol use; struggling relationships; lack of work; illness and the rest, came about as the result of being poor. Some in the public domain have been trying to turn the consequence of poverty into its cause. We must speak out against this untruth.

Being poor isn’t good for you. How can someone be well when basic human needs are denied; when access to everyday life is denied and the power to change is removed?

Poverty is a bad thing. It causes social ills. Ills do not cause poverty any more than spots cause measles.

But blame is always a way out of feeling uncomfortable about injustice. We’d prefer to think that others “had it coming” and we try hard to distinguish between the worthy and unworthy. Who’s to blame?

This is a verse from an ironic song by Sydney Carter in which a robber is being crucified next to a carpenter:

It was on a Friday morning
that they took me from the cell
and I saw they had a carpenter
to crucify as well
You can blame it on to Pilate
You can blame it on the Jews
You can blame it on the Devil
It’s God I accuse

It’s God they ought to crucify
instead of you and me
I said to the carpenter,
a-hanging on the tree

God’s response to “blame” is “I’m responsible” - and the cross is a huge statement by God that as creator, God claims responsibility. God gave human beings a wonderful gift of freedom programmed deeply into our nature. A huge risk; for true choice means we can choose not to love, and not loving has profound consequences, not only for our happiness, but that of others. In that sense, because God is responsible, poverty and sin, sickness and sadness become possible. But God is not to blame, for the creator’s intention is only good; freely given love is the greatest of all gifts and the most challenging of all expectations.

Who is to blame for poverty? That is possibly an unhelpful question, so put it in a God-centred way. Who is responsible for poverty? And the God answer is: “I am, you are, we are.” This is the “cross” solution: a unilateral acceptance that God has given us a challenge and a gift, and by being responsible we side with God in the only way we can: to end misery and extend his rule of love and joy. Wesley put this in a practical and uncomfortable way: “Every shilling which you needlessly spend… is, in effect, stolen from God and the poor.”

{ 0 comments }

Meeting Mystery: an Easter sermon

by Richard on March 30, 2013

Kim’s Easter sermon

The resurrection of Jesus, however, puts an end to all such self-serving manipulation of God. For note well: the resurrection of Jesus is fundamentally a message about God. “Jesus is alive!” doesn’t quite capture this significance. “Christ is risen!”, because God raised him, does. The subject of the resurrection is God. Indeed Karl Barth called the resurrection “a paraphrase of the word ‘God’”. The resurrection defines who God is: God is the God who raised Jesus from the dead. And in raising Jesus God identifies himself with Jesus and vindicates the cause that got Jesus killed – championing the poor and the shafted, challenging the rich and the powerful, rejecting the way of violence of good guys and bad guys alike.

Are you following me? Not too closely, I hope! For, again, that is the point – the point missing in that talk: the first followers of Jesus couldn’t follow it either! The Easter narratives – they are not straightforward accounts, they are “the witness of the overwhelmed” (Helmut Thielicke). It is not only futile, it is misconceived to treat them as “evidence”, to deploy them to “demonstrate” that the resurrection is a “matter of fact” which any disinterested observer must concede to be the case, such that those who don’t are either pig-headed or big-headed. For Jesus did not become an object of inspection available to anyone, he revealed himself only to those for whom the question of faith had already been raised – and dashed. It’s not that we don’t have history here, but it’s history not as we know it, Spock: it’s history that upends history as we know it.

{ 0 comments }

Good Friday with Sydney Carter

by Richard on March 29, 2013

It was on a Friday morning that they took me from the cell
and I saw they had a carpenter to crucify as well
You can blame it on to Pilate
You can blame it on the Jews
You can blame it on the Devil
Its God I accuse
It’s God they ought to crucify instead of you and me
I said to the carpenter, a-hanging on the tree

You can blame it on to Adam
You can blame it on to Eve
You can blame it on the apple,
but that I can’t believe
It was God that made the Devil
And the woman and the man
And there wouldn’t be an apple
If it wasn’t in the plan
It’s God they ought to crucify instead of you and me
I said to the carpenter, a-hanging on the tree

Now Barabbas was a killer
And they let Barabbas go
But you are being crucified
For nothing that I know
And your God is up in Heaven
and He doesn’t do a thing
With a million angels watching
and they never move a wing
It’s God they ought to crucify instead of you and me
I said to the carpenter, a-hanging on the tree

To hell with Jehovah
To the carpenter I said
I wish that a carpenter
had made the world instead
Goodbye and good luck to you
our ways will soon divide
Remember me tomorrow
The man you hung beside
It’s God they ought to crucify instead of you and me
I said to the carpenter, a-hanging on the tree

Sydney Carter

{ 0 comments }

Good Friday is the 100th anniversary of the birth of R.S. Thomas. Everyone has heard of Dylan Thomas, but the Swansea sot was not fit to untie the shoes of his Cardiff namesake, who was surely one of the finest poets — and certainly in the top three or four “religious” poets — of the twentieth century. Thomas was nominated for the Nobel Prize for Literature — he didn’t get it (but then neither did Wallace Stevens, the contemporary poet he admired most) — but I smile at the thought of an acceptance speech given to a cosmopolitan audience by the cantankerous deracinated Welsh nationalist who once wrote, “Perhaps God is a monkey after all. They like to urinate at strangers”.

It is providentially apposite that Thomas’ centenary should fall on Good Friday because he was a poeta crucis par excellence. Thomas himself confessed that he had little to say about resurrection joy (though chocolate was bliss!), and while his later poetry could be lyrically, if longingly, tender, when, near the end of an interview the year before his death, it was suggested that “we haven’t done love yet,” he replied: “Love will have to wait until next time.” For Thomas God’s agape was agonistic, predatory, burning like a bush set in the bleak Welsh landscape the poet wandered, observed, and incisively etched with words; and his own faith was fiercely fought and relentlessly interrogative. Writing in the tradition of apophatic theology, Thomas was a “Poet of the Hidden God” (D.Z. Phillips), the deus absconditus. Indeed for Thomas, not only Good Friday but Easter itself revealed the absence of God.

But Thomas’ verse does not demonstrate the rather trivial truth that language is inherently unable to grasp God. Rather it is the poetic expression, written on his knees, of persistently probing prayer. Simone Weil observed that “the very reason why God has decided to hide himself is that we might have an idea of what he is like”. What Thomas does is to translate idea into image. He demonstrates (in Phillips’ words) that “to say that God makes a difference to the world by virtue of his absence from it is not to fail to talk of the reality of God, but to show how talk of such a reality gets a hold on human life” — with, in Thomas’ own words, “his talons”.

Here is a triptych of poems - two for Good Friday and one for Easter — from the brooding bird-watching bard, Christ’s curmudgeon Cymraeg.

“The Coming”

And God held in his hand
A small globe. Look, he said.
The son looked. Far off,
As through water, he saw
A scorched land of fierce
Colour. The light burned
There; crusted buildings
Cast their shadows: a bright
Serpent, a river
Uncoiled itself, radiant
With slime.
On a bare
Hill a bare tree saddened
The sky. Many people
Held out their thin arms
To it, as though waiting
For a vanished April
To return to its crossed
Boughs. The son watched
Them. Let me go there, he said.

Later Poems (London: Macmillan, 1983)

From “Crucifixion”

God’s fool, God’s jester
capering at his right hand
in torment, proving the fallacy
of the impassible, reminding
him of omnipotence’s limits.

I have seen the figure
on our human tree, burned
into it by thought’s lightning
and it writhed as I looked.

A god has no alternative
but himself. With what crown
plurality but with thorns?
Whose is the mirthless laughter
at the beloved irony
at his side? The universe over,
omniscience warns, the crosses
are being erected from such
material as is available
to remorse. What are the stars
but time’s fires going out
before ever the crucified
can be taken down.
Today
there is only this one option
before me. Remembering,
as one goes out into space,
on the way to the sun,
how dark it will grow,
I stare up into the darkness
of his countenance, knowing it
a reflection of the three days and nights
at the back of love’s looking-
glass even a god must spend.

Not the empty tomb
but the uninhabited
cross. Look long enough
and you will see the arms
put on leaves. Not a crown
of thorns, but a crown of flowers
haloing it, with a bird singing
as though perched on paradise’s threshold.

We have over-furnished
our faith. Our churches
are as limousines in the procession
towards heaven. But the verities
remain: a de-nuclearised
cross, uncontaminated
by our coinage; the chalice’s ichor; and one crumb of bread
on the tongue for the bird-like
intelligence to be made tame by.

Counterpoint (Newcastle upon Tyne: Bloodaxe Books, 1990)

“‘Easter. I approach’”

Easter, I approach
the year’s empty tomb.
What has time done with
itself? Is the news worth
the communicating? The word’s
loincloth can remember
little. A thin, cold wind
blows from beyond the abysm
that I gawp into. But supposing
there were bones; the darkness
illuminated like a museum?
In glass cases I have
peered at the brittle bundles,
exonerating my conscience
with mortality’s tears.
But here, true to my name,
I have nothing to hold on
to, an absence so much richer
than a presence, offering
instead of the skull’s
leer an impalpable possibility
for faith’s fingertips to explore.

R.S. Thomas: Uncollected Poems, eds. Tony Brown and Jason Walford Davies (Northumberland: Bloodaxe Books, 2013)

{ 0 comments }

and being in agony he prayed more earnestly… Luke 22:44

His last prayer in the garden began, as most
of his prayers began — in earnest, certainly,
but not without distraction, an habitual … what?

Distance? Well, yes, a sort of distance, or a mute
remove from the genuine distress he witnessed
in the endlessly grasping hands of multitudes

and often enough, in his own embarrassing
circle of intimates. Even now, he could see
these where they slept, sprawled upon their robes or wrapped

among the arching olive trees. Still, something new,
unlikely, uncanny was commencing as he spoke.
As the divine in him contracted to an ache,

a throbbing in the throat, his vision blurred, his voice
grew thick and unfamiliar, his prayer — just before
it fell to silence — became uniquely earnest.

And in the moment — perhaps because it was so
new — he saw something, had his first taste of what
he would become, first pure taste of the body, and the blood.

{ 2 comments }

Holy Week :: Wednesday :: The Widow’s Mite

by Richard on March 27, 2013

Jesus sat down opposite the place where the offerings were put and watched the crowd putting their money into the temple treasury. Many rich people threw in large amounts. But a poor widow came and put in two very small copper coins, worth only a fraction of a penny. Calling his disciples to him, Jesus said, “I tell you the truth, this poor widow has put more into the treasury than all the others. They all gave out of their wealth; but she, out of her poverty, put in everything–all she had to live on.”
Mark 12: 41-44

This another of the gospel stories I’m convinced has been consistently misinterpreted. Every sermon I’ve ever heard on this passage — and some I’ve preached myself — have read this as a commendation of the widow’s faith, giving all she had to the work of God. They go on to exhort congregations to think about how sacrificially they’re prepared to give.

The only way we could reach such an interpretation of this story is by reading it in isolation, separated from what went before and comes after, so let’s remind ourselves. Jesus has just warned against the teachers of the Law who “devour widows’ houses”, only to see a widow putting the last of her money into the temple treasury. “See,” says Jesus. “Just as I said.”

There disciples aren’t convinced, being too impressed by the magnificence of the buildings — prompting Jesus to warn of the temple’s imminent destruction. Read in context, this story is a link in the chain of Jesus’ announcement of the end of the temple and the repressive authority it represents.

Far from being a commendation of the widow’s faith, this is a condemnation of those who cause a poor women to destitute herself for the sake of religious observance.

{ 1 comment }

Later they sent some of the Pharisees and Herodians to Jesus to catch him in his words. They came to him and said, “Teacher, we know you are a man of integrity. You aren’t swayed by men, because you pay no attention to who they are; but you teach the way of God in accordance with the truth. Is it right to pay taxes to Caesar or not? Should we pay or shouldn’t we?” But Jesus knew their hypocrisy. “Why are you trying to trap me?” he asked. “Bring me a denarius and let me look at it.” They brought the coin, and he asked them, “Whose portrait is this? And whose inscription?” “Caesar’s,” they replied. Then Jesus said to them, “Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s and to God what is God’s.” And they were amazed at him.
Mark 12: 13-17

Having created a stir in the temple courtyard by his actions, Jesus continues to stir things up with his teaching. The poll tax was regarded with deep hatred by the Jews and presumably the Pharisees and Herodians (a strange and unholy alliance!) thought they had Jesus by the proverbials with their question: if he says, “Don’t pay” he can be dobbed in to the Romans; if he says “Pay up” the people can be turned against him. Gotcha.

There is nothing evasive in Jesus’ answer. By asking them to produce a denarius, the coin used for the paying of the poll tax, Jesus has his questioners “hoist by their own petard”. In carrying Caesar’s money, they are implicitly accepting Caesar’s authority. More seriously, they have brought images of the emperor into the temple, an act strictly forbidden by the Law. In doing so, they have shown where their loyalties lie.

“If you owe Caesar, pay Caesar.”

What we have here is not parallelism of God and Caesar, but a clear opposition between the two. Further confrontation is inevitable.

{ 1 comment }

On reaching Jerusalem, Jesus entered the temple area and began driving out those who were buying and selling there. He overturned the tables of the money changers and the benches of those selling doves, and would not allow anyone to carry merchandise through the temple courts.
Mark 11:15-16 (New International Version)

The 3 synoptic gospels tell us that after Jesus had made his grand entrance into Jerusalem, he went to the temple and chased out the moneychangers and the sellers of sacrificial animals. It’s a story that many Christians are fond of. Here is none of that wimpy turn-the-other-cheek guff. This is a kick ass Jesus who knows how to sort out the bad guys. Time and again, this incident has been used by Christians to justify their participation in violence. Faced with the exploitation of the temple courtyards, Jesus forgets the idealistic nonsense and gives them a taste of the only language they’ll understand.

Yes?

No!

First, forget any assumption that Jesus is objecting to commerce in the temple. This was essential for two reasons. First, the law demanded the sacrifice of unblemished animals. Having animals available for sale ‘on the spot’ made a good deal of sense. How irritating would it be to drag a basket with a couple of doves in it all the way from Galilee to discover when you arrived in Jerusalem that they weren’t up to scratch? Like the animal sellers, the moneychangers provided an essential service, turning Roman money (with its image of the emperor) into something which could be taken into the temple without breaking the Law of God. So these weren’t corrupt practices, but essential to the running of the temple.

What we see when Jesus goes to the temple is not a violent confrontation with evil-doers. Like Palm Sunday, it’s another bit of street theatre — or enacted prophecy, if you’d rather. Jesus is declaring the end of the temple and its sacrifices, not acting decisively to protect its purity. Here he stands in a direct line which runs from the prophets, who were ever suspicious of the temple and its hierarchy. For this reason, the title ‘cleansing of the temple’ is a bit of a misnomer. Jesus isn’t seeking to reform or renew the Temple. In this prophetic act, he’s declaring its end.

To try to use this incident as a justification for Christian involvement in violence is an act of utter desperation. Faced with the overwhelming evidence of the life and teaching of Jesus, the only way such reasoning can be sustained is by giving priority to an existing commitment to pursue violence over the Lordship of Christ. It’s as simple as that. No one can serve two masters, he said. And he meant it.

{ 3 comments }

“Whoever offers their life out of love for Christ, and in service to others, will live like the seed that dies … May this immolated body and this blood sacrificed for all nourish us so that we may offer our body and our blood as Christ did, and thus bring justice and peace to our people. Let us join, then, in the faith and hope of this intimate moment of prayer.”

– Oscar Romero, as he lifted the cup at Mass in the chapel of the Divine Providence Hospital, San Salvador — and was shot dead by an assassin’s bullet to his heart.

{ 2 comments }

Hymn of the day

by Richard on March 24, 2013

A change from Charles Wesley - we’ll let Kim Fabricius have Palm Sunday.

Jesus entering the city
on a donkey, grand but gritty,
weeping tears of peace and pity -
rocks and stones cannot be dumb.

Jesus at the place of praying,
overturning tables, saying,
“In my Father’s house no paying!” -
now the temple’s Judge has come.

Jesus in the temple preaching,
using stories for his teaching,
Pharisees and scribes are screeching,
while the traitor does his sums.

Jesus breaking bread at table
with the friends that he’s enabled -
“Who’s the greatest?” - speech of Babel -
fit not even for the crumbs.

Jesus in the garden crying,
“Spare me from this dreadful dying!”
God is silent - terrifying! -
but the Saviour won’t succumb.

Jesus at his execution
starts religion’s revolution,
end of violent retribution -
victim victor now becomes.

Kim Fabricius

(Suggested tune: Quem pastores laudavere)

{ 0 comments }